CO129-433 - Governor Sir May - 1916 [5-6] — Page 603

be feusionalle seems to have been

A

ana eten

of dispute. Sir W. (2)

Des Voeux desf. referred to

aduits

in para 2 to the interpretation

there swin

but

4

The Pos.

was

clect t

A

jadge,

in 1888 fully contemplated that

595 anisert om Aageland's service might be considered to be pensionable I find

no decision to the contrary

I think

in the circumstances

MAR

CALAAL

only approve.

31.7

16

not at

the time inclined to accept

the idea that a

aff d

a

Wie Hazeland was, by the

Judge, should

be allowed to count

such service for pension.

But on the which, and

S.o. quoted

S

and in wtw

J

Zur Hazeland, I think

it will be fairest to allow the while

fariod & be tensionalle. The period

affected is

1983 When

I hov 1878

Fur Hareland

to 21

21 bag was "Zeist

Check Supreme Court. 1888 in fara I

of desk. is clearly a mistake: See the

copy of fur Hazeland's letter,

? Approve.

103

25/7/16

I think it is established in

the corresp. that the fort of Hongkong